This myth seems to have been started in 2004 by the infamous lawdawg on his MLMlaw blog, with a post Zero Population Growth (update: the site has since been removed). Lawdawg takes a quote from a press release stating that Quixtar has a sales force of about 340,000 IBOs –
Though it’s young, Quixtar already has a sizable sales force: about 340,000 distributors — Independent Business Owners, or IBOs, as Quixtar calls them
He then takes some figures from the FTC v Amway case in 1979-
1. The number of active distributors since 1972 has remained relatively constant, fluctuating around 300,000, climbing in 1977 to about 360,000.
And “confirms” his 2003 figure by quoting a 2003 Tax court case Guadagno v. Commissioner, where it states –
Amway has about 360, 000 independent distributors.
On the face of it, this lookings pretty damning doesn’t it? Nearly 30 years and no growth in IBO numbers! A little common sense though makes one think. It certainly made me think when I read lawdawg’s page, and here is what I found ….
Ponder this
From FTC v Amway –
183. Amway’s United States sales have grown from $4.3 million in 1963 to $169.1 million in 1976. Worldwide sales of Amway products in 1976 amounted to about $205 million. (RX 431, RX 448) [71]
and the same press release lawdawg quotes –
Quixtar, which sells in the United States and Canada, hit the $1 billion sales level for the first time last year, and has set monthly records since then.
Hmm ….
1976 Amway Sales – $169,100,000
2003 Quixtar Sales – $1,035,000,000
What’s more, prior to 2000, Amway reported estimated retail sales, ie sales as if IBOs had sold them at recommended retail price. Since 2000 they have reported actual sales. The FTC reported the markup in 1976 was on average 03%, so comparing actual sales (a little over a billion in 2003) we have –
1976 Amway Sales – $130,076,923
2003 Quixtar Sales – $1,035,000,000
Lawdawg would have us believe, that without any change in the number of IBOs, the sales for the corporation have increased nearly 700%!
Even adjusting for inflation, and converting to year 2003 dollars, sales in 1976 would only be equivalent to approx $425,061,704. From 1976 to 2003 there has been a more than doubling in sales volume, or inflation adjusted, growth of 143%.
1976 Amway Sales – $425,061,704 (inflation adjusted)
2003 Quixtar Sales – $1,035,000,000
Have IBOs really become so much more efficient, and profitable? What’s going on?
What’s going on is that the two numbers lawdawg compares aren’t measuring the same thing. In the FTC v Amway case, the numbers reported were “active distributors”. How was “active” defined in FTC v Amway?
At the end of the calendar year the files are cleared of the names of distributors who elected not to continue. The number of distributors at the beginning of the year therefore is close to the number of active distributors.
In other words, it’s the number of IBOs that actually renewed. How is “active” defined by Quixtar today? From thisbiznow.com –
**Based on an independent survey during 21. “Active” means an IBO attempted to make a retail sale, or presented the Independent Business Ownership Plan, or received bonus money, or attended a company or IBO meeting in the year 2001.
Two completely different measurements of “active”. You can’t compare them.
So what’s the truth? Fortunately, with a little straightforward math, we can do a comparison of like with like.
Fun With Numbers!
So, actual sales in 1976 were $169,100,000. FTC v Amway also reports –
In 1973-74 the average BV for each distributor was about $33 a month.
BV stands for Business Volume and at that time was equivalent to the value of the products less the retail markup – ie the actual price sold to IBOs. I’ve already accounted for the retail markup, so to obtain the total number of IBOs in 1976, it’s a simple matter of dividing the sales figure by the sales per IBO for the year –
Total IBOs in 1976 = $169,100,000/($33*12) = 427,020
Now, it’s possible that the BV per IBO changed between 1974 and 1976, however the FTC reports it increased from $20 to $33 between 69/70 and 73/74. This means any adjustment in the number of IBOs would likely be a decrease. We’ll take the higher number.
What about for Quixtar in 2003/2004? Well, Quixtar Platinums have access to something called “The Platinum Index”, which provides the very statistics we need. A copy of the 2004 index, providing statistics for 2003, is on QuixtarBlog. From this we have the following information –
Quixtar actual sales 23: | $1,035,000,000 |
Average Monthly PV per IBO: | 38.46 |
Average amount of PV for each $1 spent: | 0.37 |
Now, this time the calculation is fractionally more complicated, since we have to account for “PV” and convert to BV.
Average Monthly BV per IBO = PV per IBO/PV for each $1 spent = 38.46/0.37 =14BV
Total IBOs in 2003 = $1,035,000,000/($14*12) = 829,327
In other words, a 94% increase in the number of IBOs – Reasonably consistent with the inflation adjusted 143% increase in sales and the increase in BV per IBO.
These calculations required no guesswork, no estimates. “Critics” will tell you that Amway and Quixtar has “saturated”, that it hasn’t grown in 30 years.
They’re wrong.
Sales have more than doubled, and matching this, the number of IBOs has almost doubled. No guesswork. No estimates. Just pure math.
Myth BUSTED.
UPDATE 060803: I found an error in my original calculations where I mistakenly used the inflation adjusted figures to calculate the number of IBOs in 1976 instead of the actual sales data. Corrected.
Good article… hehe.. Thanks.